Navigating recent legislative changes.
When couples divorce, the division of assets can become a complex matter, particularly where retirement savings are involved. For financial advisors, understanding how marital property regimes and legislation intersect is critical to supporting clients.
Recent legal updates, effective from 1 September 2024, have aligned the definition of ‘pension interest’ across fund types – but getting the wording of divorce orders right remains just as important. The details can make or break the enforceability of an order and ultimately determine whether clients experience a smooth or frustrating outcome.
The impact of marital regimes on pension interest
South Africa recognises three matrimonial property regimes, each with implications for the division of pension interest on divorce.
Unless a couple signs an antenuptial or post-nuptial agreement, the default regime is in community of property. This legal backdrop determines whether a claim to pension interest is even possible.
Defining pension interest
Pension interest was previously defined by fund type, but from 1 September 2024 a new definition in the Pension Funds Act has brought uniformity.
It is now calculated as the member’s benefit in the fund, determined by the fund’s rules, on the date of the divorce order. This new definition applies to all retirement funds, including retirement annuity funds.
Although the older definition in the Divorce Act technically remains in place (see below), the Pension Funds Act now overrides it for any divorce orders granted from 1 September 2024 onwards.
Why divorce order wording matters
While the way pension interest is defined has changed, the legal requirements for a valid divorce order remain the same. The following conditions must be met for a retirement fund to act on the order:
It is strongly recommended that parties submit a draft order to the fund for review before finalising it in court. If an order is found to be non-binding, it must be amended. However, the pension interest will still be calculated using the original divorce date, not the date of the amendment.
Payment options for non-member spouses
Once a valid order is in place, the non-member spouse has two choices:
Non-member spouses cannot combine options – they must choose one. If the order specifies a rand amount and a lump sum is chosen, the amount paid out will be after tax – i.e. the stated figure is a gross amount.
Withdrawals during pending divorce proceedings
Where the fund is notified (with proof) that divorce proceedings are under way, any instruction by the member spouse to withdraw from the savings component cannot be processed without the written consent of the non-member spouse.
This safeguard also applies in cases involving religious marriages and continues until the divorce is finalised.
What this means for financial advisors
These changes aim to bring greater alignment across fund types, but the legal requirements for enforceable orders remain rigorous.
Understanding the updated framework and ensuring precise wording in divorce orders can help clients avoid delays and unintended outcomes. At a time when clarity and certainty are especially valuable, attention to detail can make a meaningful difference.
Pre-1 September 2024 definition of ‘pension interest
For divorce orders granted before 1 September 2024, pension interest is defined in Section 1 of the Divorce Act as follows:
WRITTEN BY DIONNE NAGAN
Dionne Nagan is a retail legal expert
While every reasonable effort is taken to ensure the accuracy and soundness of the contents of this publication, neither writers of articles nor the publisher will bear any responsibility for the consequences of any actions based on information or recommendations contained herein. Our material is for informational purposes.